Skip to content

A Common-Sense Approach to Collecting Household Data

March 30, 2010

Household income is an obvious determinant of poverty. Traditionally, researchers have used household surveys—in which the the head of the household (typically, the husband) is interviewed—to determine household income. But a recent IFPRI discussion paper suggests that this may not always be the best approach, and that it could lead to inaccurate representations, since husbands are rarely able to estimate their wives’ income correctly.

In Who Should Be Interviewed in Surveys of Household Income? (IFPRI Discussion Paper 949), authors Monica Fisher, Jeffrey J. Reimer, and Edward R. Carr explain that a householder’s estimate of his wife’s income is often unreliable for a number of reasons, including misinformation, incomplete pooling of money, and conflict over the distribution of resources. Based on data from surveys conducted in southern Malawi throughout 2008, the authors noted that husbands and wives who were separately asked to estimate the amount of income generated by the wife arrived at the same estimates in only 6 percent of the studied households. Thus, if the husband is the only member of the household being interviewed, survey responses might not be telling the full story.

“The study highlights how important it is for researchers to have a good understanding of the local context when they design a survey instrument to collect household income data,” explains lead author Monica Fisher, a research fellow in IFPRI’s Development Strategy and Governance Division. “In some settings, it may suffice to interview the male household head only—for example, if the head is the only income earner.”

However, the authors suggest that surveying all adult members of the household about their incomes and expenditures results in a more realistic picture of household finances. “In situations where there is clear evidence of individual incomes and these incomes are not directly observable,” says Fisher, “it is recommended that interviews be conducted with multiple income earners.”

Interviewing only one person per household does save time and reduces the expense of a survey. But while cost efficiency and timeliness are certainly important factors to consider in developmental research, the authors’ findings suggest that spending just a bit more time and money can help ensure the collection of accurate data.

About these ads
One Comment leave one →
  1. Charles Chinkhuntha permalink
    April 12, 2010 8:03 am

    while the situation may be true for southern Malawi, it may not be the case with central and north Malawi. actually the households in southern malawi are generally headed by wives because the southern part of malawi practices matrilineal kind of marriage. in which case, the wife assumes full respnsibility of the household than a man who is always regarded as a stranger. therfore issues of pooling resouces may ensue. however if you go up north, the general understanding is that a wife has to be submissive to the husband and the husband controls all economic activities of the housholds including the earnings of the wife.

    in other words, my point is, lets read the situation and see if interviewing extra income earner of the household may give extra and ‘accurate’ information. otherwise, it’s still costly to interview more people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: